mainlogo
Places for those who think:
 
On The Left:
                  On The Right:
  America Blog      Heritage Foundation
 Daily Kos         Cato Institute
 Liberal Oasis     Citzens Against Gov't Waste
 Moveon.org        Media Research Center
 The Nation        Townhall
 Talk Left         Civil Society Project
 Crooks And Liars  Renew America
 The Raw Story     American Enterprise Inst.
 
Mother Jones      Big Government
 
(These aren't necessarily meant to represent the best of all political websites, but they're a good start.)



Schedule PSE Now And End The Meth Scourge

Gary Gerard, dumbhoosier.com
If you care about the local methamphetamine problem our county has been battling, this is an important week ahead.
Two bills originating in the Indiana House of Representatives are aimed at curbing the problem. In my humble opinion, only one of them does.
Both bills will be debated in the Indiana House Committee on Public Health Wednesday afternoon.
One bill makes cold medicines containing pseudoephedrine HCI available by prescription only.
The other bill sets up an electronic system to track sales of PSE.
Obviously, only one of those bills will make it out of committee and have a chance to become law. (If PSE is prescription only, there would be nothing to track.)
As loyal readers know, I believe the only way to end the meth epidemic in our county is for PSE to be prescription only.
It’s simple. No PSE. No meth labs.
The Indiana State Police tell us that 50 percent of all the PSE cold meds sold in Indiana wind up in meth labs. Half.
So the pharmaceutical companies who make PSE cold meds will lose 50 percent of those sales right off the bat if these meds are made prescription only.
Guess who’s against making PSE a prescription drug? Guess who’s offered to pay for the tracking system?
You know.
Profit. That’s one bogus argument for tracking.
Another bogus argument for tracking is inconvenience. Somebody wants cold medicine and doesn’t want to see the doctor. Two points:
1. Buy a non-PSE cold medicine.
2. I’m pretty sure most doctors won’t demand an office visit for a stuffy nose. They’ll phone in a script for you if they know who you are.
Another bogus argument for tracking is that making PSE a prescription drug is an onerous government intrusion into our lives.
Really? Seriously?
Let’s think about this.
Let’s say PSE cold meds are made prescription only.
I get a prescription for a PSE cold med. It’s between me, my doctor and my pharmacist. The information exchanged is protected by the the federal Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act.
Now, let’s say a PSE tracking system is put in place.
I walk into a pharmacy to buy a box of PSE cold meds. I have to show my ID, most likely my driver’s license. My name, address, date of birth, drivers’ license number, date of purchase and type of purchase goes into the tracking system.
Type that information into a LexisNexis database an up pops your property ownership, where you live now, (and where you have lived most of your life), where your kids go to school, how many and what type of vehicles are registered to you, any type of professional licenses you may have, who all your relatives are and the first five digits of your social security number.
Now, I’m not saying that’s necessarily a problem. That info is floating around out there anyway and it’s mainly going to be accessed only by the cops. (Unless, of course, the WikiLeaks guy wants to expose your PSE purchases. He’ll just hack in.)
Nonetheless, the PSE tracking database would be just one more portal into your personal information.
Which begs the question for all you Libertarian, Tea Party, anti-big-government types: Which system truly provides the most government intrusion into your life? PSE as a prescription, or PSE tracking?
You know.
And as compelling as those arguments against tracking may be, there is this 800-pound gorilla in the room.
Tracking just plain doesn’t work. All tracking systems tried in other states have failed.
The Indiana Methamphetamine Investigation System – in place here since last August  – doesn’t work. We’ve got more meth labs now than ever.
Here’s why.
A person who buys PSE for meth labs is called a Smurfer. I don’t know why, that’s just what they call these people.
Smurfers easily subvert a tracking system by grabbing somebody else’s ID.
With IMIS, the Smurfer had to be careful. If he bought over the limit, he could get caught later when the cops looked over the data.
The Meth Check system being touted now is even less effective because it adds a “stop alert.”
It goes like this: Under IMIS, the Smurfer goes in and buys on his ID. If he’s over the limit, he could get caught because he bought too much PSE in too short a time. He has broken the law.
But under Meth Check, the smurfer goes in and tries to buy on his ID. The pharmacists says, “Sorry Mr. Smurfer, that would put you over the limit.” So the Smurfer leaves the store, gets another ID, goes to another store and buys PSE.
He can’t get busted because he never buys over the limit.
Kentucky tried Meth Check. Kentucky is now known in meth circles as “Smurfer haven.” You literally don’t have to worry about getting caught trying to buy too much PSE.
The result of all this is a large and growing group of individuals willing to be Smurfers. People who have never used or cooked meth are willing to buy PSE.  They pay $6 for a box of it and sell it to the meth cook for $75 or so.
Meth cookers have stacks of IDs they dole out to friends or family members.
The Missouri Associated Press ran a story about tracking a month or so ago. Here are the first two  paragraphs.
ST. LOUIS – Electronic systems that track sales of the cold medicine used to make methamphetamine have failed to curb the drug trade and instead created a vast, highly lucrative market for profiteers to buy over-the-counter pills and sell them to meth producers at a huge markup.
An Associated Press review of federal data shows that the lure of such easy money has drawn thousands of new people into the methamphetamine underworld over the last few years.
Knowing all this – and they do know all this – why in the world would any self-respecting lawmaker even consider Meth Check for Indiana?
You know.
So here’s the deal. Scheduling works. Tracking doesn’t.
Oregon returned PSE to prescription status. That state has completely eliminated Smurfing and virtually eliminated meth labs.
If scheduling passes, PSE would be prescription only beginning July 1.
If tracking passes, it would start Jan 1, 2012. Even though it will have no impact on the number of meth labs, we’ll have to “give it a try” for a couple years.
That’s three more years of stories like these:
A 24-year-old mother of two took her toddler/infant kids to a neighbor’s house and went back home to cook a little meth. Her glass one-pot lab blew up. Shards of glass cut her throat. She bled to death on her bedroom floor. Hey, on the upside, at least her kids didn't have to watch their mommy die.
A five-month-old died recently. The toxicology reports aren’t in yet, but the cops believe it was because of continuous secondhand exposure to her parents cooking and smoking meth.
Remember.
No PSE. No meth labs. Simple.
Make PSE available by prescription only and the number of meth labs will dwindle to near zero.
Come on people. Let lawmakers know it’s time to quit screwing around and get this done.
Dr. Tim Brown is chairman of the committee on public health that is deciding which bill to send to the full house.
765-362-7024
317-232-9762.
You know.


Archives