Places
for those who think:
America Blog
Heritage FoundationOn The Left: On The Right: Daily Kos Cato Institute Liberal Oasis Citzens Against Gov't Waste Moveon.org Media Research Center The Nation Townhall Talk Left Civil Society Project Crooks And Liars Renew America The Raw Story American Enterprise Inst. Mother Jones Big Government (These aren't necessarily meant to represent the best of all political websites, but they're a good start.) |
Arguments For Abortion
Fall Short By Eric Fink, for dumbhoosier.com Seemed like today with some of the friends I have on Facebook there were two heated debates that were going on. One was abortion and the other being Planned Parenthood. Before anyone reads on, I want to let you know that I am defiantly pro-life and against abortions. So if you are one who cannot take what I am saying on this issue with an open mind (if you are on the flip side), then I advise you to stop reading this post. I would like to go over some of the arguments that I saw on my friends wall, and offer my point of view. First one argument that is used is that Planned Parenthood (PP) offers other services that benefit women and helps plan pregnancies. Yes there are some good things that come out of PP but, it almost sounds to me like we are saying we should overlook the little bit of evil that they are doing because there is some good. I am sorry but good does not outweigh bad. Perhaps this is because I am a Christian and I know that if one person was to do trillions of good things in one's life and only one bad thing; the trillions of good things would not outweigh the one bad thing you did. I would like to add that PP is a racist eugenicist that was founded by Margaret Sagner. The following link will take you to some of her quotes, as well as some of the quotes from PP today. I think you should see that very little has changed: http://www.dianedew.com/sanger.htm One person I read talked about how they educate people. I cannot argue that they don't, but I know many of the facilities will not let the mother see the ultrasound. The reason why is that a great majority of people think that the "baby" in the mother is just a mass of slime. However when they see the ultrasound even from early stages they often change there mind. So, if they are about educating people then why not educate them on this matter? Another argument that I saw (one that I hear all the time in fact) is that Roe Vs. Wade has made it legal. First I would like to point out that both Roe and Wade are now pro-life and are now working together to get it back to the supreme court and have it now illegal again. I really hate this argument because it is saying that when something is legal it is always right. Perhaps some of this comes from my faith in God/Jesus. However most people would agree that Hitler's Nazi Empire was wrong. However if you are to use this argument then we cannot criticize Hitler as it was legal to exterminate and place people in concentration camps. Or how about countries that have child sex slaves where its even legal? Another argument that I saw that I hear often is this (and I am placing it directly from facebook): What is wrong having your OWN beliefs and following them, just because you believe in them? In theory there is nothing wrong with having our own beliefs. However if there is truly nothing wrong then we have to also consider some extremes. For example, Charles Manson believed it was right to kill people. Again, I mention Hitler's beliefs. Or how about people who believe they are god and they are to kill any who disagree. This is a dangerous thought process to think about. I will only list one more. I know many women talk about how low income women need some of their services. First in many places there are free facilities. Where I live I know of two places off the top of my head. One girl went as far to use the argument of: "Do you have a vagina?" to a man when he was talking on this issue. I would like to ask this to her: "Do you have a penis?" I ask her this because cervical cancer is not as common as the medical field makes it out to be. In fact male testicular cancer is more common. Granted at one time cervical was more common. Here is a good website on this.: http://www.kevinmd.com/blog/2009/11/informed-consent-missing-pap-smears-cervical-cancer-screening.html. However, Testicular cancer is rarely mentioned. In closing I will end by asking this, followed by a story of my experience with planned parenthood: Since Testicular cancer seems to be on the rise, why is it we aren't seeing free men's clinics not just for this, but for other male issues. When I first got married my wife and I went to a local planned parenthood a few times (prior to what we know about them now). We were turned off because of how they treated me. They were disrespectful to me and did not want me to go back at all to the exam room with my wife, until we both put our foot down. So if PP is supposed to be about "family planning" why did they not want me to get involved in the stuff my wife was going there for at the time? Bio: Eric Fink is 28 married and has one daughter. He holds a B.S. in Counseling and Sociology from Grace College and a Certificate in Theology from Associated Mennonite Biblical Seminary. He has spent time in South Korea teaching English. Currently Eric is seeking employment. Eric's hobbies include cooking (mostly Asian foods), reading and computers. |