mainlogo
Places for those who think:
 
On The Left:
                  On The Right:
  America Blog      Heritage Foundation
 Daily Kos         Cato Institute
 Liberal Oasis     Citzens Against Gov't Waste
 Moveon.org        Media Research Center
 The Nation        Townhall
 Talk Left         Civil Society Project
 Crooks And Liars  Renew America
 The Raw Story     American Enterprise Inst.
 
Mother Jones      Big Government
 
(These aren't necessarily meant to represent the best of all political websites, but they're a good start.)



Our Leaders Can't Make Tough Choices

Gary Gerard, dumbhoosier.com
Our venerable leaders in Washington are starting to barely nibble around the edges of talking about the deficit woes facing our nation.
I say that because what I am hearing is so ridiculous I can’t believe they stand at the podium straight-faced when they pontificate about “getting the deficit under control.”
One of the things President Obama likes to demagogue is the notion that rich people aren’t taxed enough.
Fine.
I will concede that point to the president. Rich people aren’t taxed enough.
In order to fix that, he says, we need to return to the Clinton-era tax rates on people who make $200,000 or more per year.
Fine.
Again, point conceded. So let’s take a look at that.
The Clinton-era tax rate on those folks was 39 percent. Right now, it’s 35 percent.
But, of course, with myriad IRS rules and accounting gimmicks, those rates aren’t close to what those people actually pay.
According to the most recent statistics from the IRS. The effective tax rate on the 400 most wealthy Americans is 18.1 percent. On those earning $500,000 to $1,000,000, the effective rate is 24.1 percent and those who made $200,000 to $500,000 paid 19.6 percent.
So the average effective tax rate for people earning $200,000 or more is somewhere around 20 percent. And if we returned the top rate to 39 percent from the current 35 percent, the effective rate would rise a couple of percent, to around 22 or 23.
In the most recent data, from 2008, there were around 4.5 million people in the U.S. who made $200,000 or more. They earned approximately $2.8 trillion and paid $610 billion in taxes.
So another 2 percent bump in the effective tax rate on top of that $610 billion would net the U.S. treasury an additional $12 billion.
But the budget this year is $3.6 trillion. The revenue is $2.2 trillion and there is a $1.4 trillion deficit. Heck, if you ran the effective tax rate on the wealthy folks to 50 percent – which would require a marginal tax rate of at least 70 percent – that would only raise $1.4 trillion.
That’s barely enough to erase this year’s budget deficit.
Politicians on both sides of the argument want to fix the problem without causing any pain. One side doesn’t want to raise taxes. The other side doesn’t want to cut programs.
It’s a classic standoff and nothing gets done. The problem is, they’ve been at a standoff on these issues for so long our economic system is at a tipping point. We can’t keep raising the debt limit, printing dollars and selling treasury bills to cover our bets.
Politicians and voters alike have to realize our way of life is at stake here. There will have to be tax increases and there will have to be deep cuts in government programs if we’re ever going to get this budget under control.
I was talking about this stuff with a good friend. She thinks the U.S. – and it’s government – has simply become too big. She said she doubts if our leaders in Washington are capable of agreeing on much of anything. And certainly not on the tough steps necessary to solve the budget and deficit crises.
I sincerely hope she’s wrong, but I have a strong suspicion she may be right.

Archives