mainlogo
Places for those who think:
 
On The Left:
                  On The Right:
  America Blog      Heritage Foundation
 Daily Kos         Cato Institute
 Liberal Oasis     Citzens Against Gov't Waste
 Moveon.org        Media Research Center
 The Nation        Townhall
 Talk Left         Civil Society Project
 Crooks And Liars  Renew America
 The Raw Story     American Enterprise Inst.
 
Mother Jones      Big Government
 
(These aren't necessarily meant to represent the best of all political websites, but they're a good start.)



Why Does Everybody Have To Defend Their Party?

By Gary Gerard, dumbhoosier.com
I fashion myself as a center right kind of guy. Fiscally conservative, but a little more socially liberal. But there is big difference between me and some of my liberal friends.
I see them ranting on Facebook all the time about how stupid the Republican candidates for president are.
And frankly, maybe with the exception of Mitt Romney,  the Republican candidates for president have been doing and saying some pretty ridiculous stuff.
I have no trouble admitting that this is one dopey collection of candidates for president.
Newt “family values” Gingrich? The guy has more baggage than Southwest Airlines.
Herman Cain? An apparent serial harasser and womanizer.
Michelle Bachmann? I can’t even look at here when she talks. She’s crazy.
Rick Perry? Also crazy. Not as crazy as Bachmann, to be sure, but crazy nonetheless.
Ron Paul? Gold standard? He probably should stick to gynecology.
Rick Santorum. If this guy took a step to the right, he would literally fall off the planet.
Jon Huntsman? Who?
Is Gary Johnson still running?
And Romney seems to be just trying to survive. His problem is this: He was for a lot of things before he was against them – or vice versa. Overall, I could vote for him before any of the others, though. He’s seems more centrist, more willing to compromise. I know that’s sacrilege to a lot of conservatives, but whatever.
It’s not hard for me to see deficiencies in Republicans.
I used to criticize President George W. Bush quite a bit. Here’s an excerpt from something I wrote in 2003.
The W administration has disappointed me yet again.
Boy, it’s getting tougher and tougher to be a conservative these days.
I’m for lower taxes and smaller government, but this administration, while doing OK on the tax side, is really starting to freak me out when it comes to spending.
Smaller government?
Au contraire.
First we got Homeland Security, an enormous expansion of government.
Now we get the Medicare prescription drug benefit, an enormous entitlement.
And this when we are looking at a single-year deficit of $500 billion next year. ...
... When you think about it, (the prescription benefit) calls for a huge new entitlement that threatens to bankrupt Medicare and wreak havoc on the economy to fix a problem that really doesn’t exist in the first place.
(Note the deficit number. Ah, yearning for the good old days when deficits were a paltry half trillion dollars.)
So yeah, Republicans screw things up. And the Republican presidential field is thinner than Donald Trump’s hair – or whatever that is on top of his head.
But in the meantime my liberal friends are still trying to convince me what a brilliant president Barack Obama is.
I’m just not buyin’ it.
Just because Bush was bad doesn’t necessarily make Obama good.
How can you defend a guy who – in no particular or chronological order –  runs up $1.5 trillion deficits year over year? Gave us a $1 trillion  healthcare plan that ballooned to a budget-busting $3 trillion before even a fraction of its provisions were enacted? Finally, had to admit that a linchpin of the healthcare overhaul, Ted Kennedy’s CLASS Act, was unworkable after being warned repeatedly it was fiscally insolvent? Turned over a massive $800 billion stimulus bill to a pork-mad Congress led by Nancy Pelosi and Harry Reid? Promised, because of the aforementioned “stimulus” that unemployment would not rise above 8 percent? Joked on camera that “shovel ready” wasn’t really “shovel ready.” Oversaw a Justice Department’s deadly missteps in the debacle that was “Fast and Furious.” Promised to close Guantanamo Bay in a year? Criticized a state immigration law he admitted he didn’t take the time to read? Initiated a “green” energy policy that literally threatens the solvency the nation and squanders billions of tax dollars in the name of crony capitalism? Extended FISA and its warrantless wiretapping? Continues to pour even more money and lives down the useless rathole that is Afghanistan? Has biffed Mideast policy to the point where they’re burning U.S. flags and Obama in effigy over there? Absolutely failed to lead on the debt ceiling supercommittee fiasco?
I could go on, but this is tiring.
Frankly, would somebody please tell me what this guy has done right?
He’s not aggressively awful, like W. He’s passively awful.
George W. Bush was a leader. Now, you may or may not have agreed with what he was pushing, but he got it done. He convinced the alleged conservatives in Congress to pass huge new government entitlements, turning surpluses into deficits.
And he got pretty much the whole country on board with an iffy Iraq war.
I also like it when liberals say things like, “Well, he’s only one man. He’s not a dictator. He’s got those Republicans in Congress standing in his way.”
That makes me chuckle. Aside from the fact that during his first two years in office he had majorities in both houses of Congress, these are the same people who blamed Bush for everything from soup to nuts.
I remember bumper stickers during the 2008 election: “Gas was $1.49 when George W. Bush took office.” Well, gas was $1.84 when Obama took office. So what?
I guess my one great hope for America – naive as it may be – is for people to stop looking at everything in politics through some partisan prism. Too many people are blinded by party labels.
It’s not right vs. left folks, it’s right vs. wrong. And this nonsensical right vs. left thing is precisely what got us into this mess in the first place.


Archives