mainlogo
Places for those who think:
 
On The Left:
                  On The Right:
  America Blog      Heritage Foundation
 Daily Kos         Cato Institute
 Liberal Oasis     Citzens Against Gov't Waste
 Moveon.org        Media Research Center
 The Nation        Townhall
 Talk Left         Civil Society Project
 Crooks And Liars  Renew America
 The Raw Story     American Enterprise Inst.
 
Mother Jones      Big Government
 
(These aren't necessarily meant to represent the best of all political websites, but they're a good start.)



This Is Why We Have Huge Deficits

Gary Gerard, dumbhoosier.com
President Barack Obama came out this week with a couple of programs that he can implement via executive order, without the blessing of Congress.
And on the face of it, both programs sound great. One was allowing people who have kept up with their mortgage payment – even though their house might be under water – to refinance.
Sounds great. Those people, though no fault of their own, own a house that’s worth less than they owe on it. They can’t take advantage of current low mortgage rates because the house won’t appraise high enough to refinance it.
But there are problems.
It will cost the government money, although I couldn’t really find any reliable estimates of how much.
Beyond that, if you’re a homeowner whose mortgage isn’t owned or guaranteed by Frannie May, you don’t qualify.
If your mortgage was sold to Frannie after May 31, 2009, you don’t qualify.
You can’t do a principal reduction to get out of a negative-equity situation.
And if your bank just doesn’t feel like participating, you’re out of luck.
So as good as it sound, not many people will probably be taking advantage.
And as much as I would like people to be helped out of an upside-down mortgage, can we really afford that right now?
The other program he announced would help college students repay their student loans.
Under the plan, students would be able to consolidate and reduce interest rates on their student loans. A second measure would move up the start of a program approved by Congress that caps monthly student-loan payments for borrowers with low incomes, from 2014 to 2012.
See, I think it’s great to help students who are buried in student loan debt, but can we really afford that now? I mean, you know who’s going to make up the difference here.
But it’s the same old thing that happens all the time during election years. Do things to help people and maybe they’ll vote for you. If Obama really wanted to do things to help, he could reign in the crazy amount of business regulations he’s created. He could reign in the uncertainty of the health care law he passed.
He could stop frittering away billions on projects like Solyndra, a manufacturer of solar panels. The Obama administration gave $535 million in loan guarantees to that firm, despite advice to the contrary. Obama and his vice president, Joe Biden, made Solyndra the centerpiece of their “green energy” initiatives.
Problem is, even while the plant was being built on the taxpayers’ dime, lots of people knew it would fail because China already had a far-superior and more economical way to manufacture the same product.
The company filed bankruptcy less than two years after taking the money from Uncle Sam. It’s all being investigated by Congress and the Feds because the CEO and board of directors happened to be big Obama donors.
Then there’s Fisker Automotive.
That outfit got $529 million in federal money to build electric cars. The company decided to build a plant that employs 500 people. Really nice, except it’s in Finland.
The company says it couldn’t find anywhere in the U.S. to build the cars.
“There was no contract manufacturer in the U.S. that could actually produce our vehicle,” the car company’s founder and namesake, Henrik Fisker, told ABC News. “They don’t exist here.”
Meanwhile, ABC reports, Fisker is more than a year behind rolling out its $97,000 luxury vehicle bankrolled in part with DOE money.
And just 40 of its Karma cars have been manufactured and only two delivered to customers.
Apparently, one of those was Leo DiCaprio, so its not like these guys are building cars for the masses.
A week or so ago Stanford University economics professor Michael Boskin spoke to the Hoosier Institution about the state of spending.
He noted that under President  Obama, federal spending has risen from 20.7 percent of gross domestic product to 25.3 percent. That happens to be the biggest ratio since 1945 when there was that whole WW II thing going on and GDP was a fraction of what it is today.
Then he talked about  a $1.2 billion Energy Department loan guarantee to SunPower Corporation in Richmond, Calif.
The company has promised to create 15 permanent positions. Now those are some pricey jobs, around $80 million apiece.
That makes Fisker  Automotive’s 500 jobs for $500 million look like a bargain. The taxpayers only ponied up $1 million each  for those.
One would think SunPower would be on solid ground, at least.
Nah.
At the time the company claimed its huge federal subsidy, its market cap was $800 million and it had $820 million in debt. It’s share price had fallen $133 in 2007 to $8, and of course, investors had filed a class-action suit claiming the company made false claims.
See, it’s this kind of craziness that gets us in such a huge hole. And I am pretty confident this is just the tip of the iceberg. We’ll probably never know how many federal dollars wind straight down a rathole in the name of “stimulus” and “green energy.”
Fiscal 2011 will see a $1.3 trillion deficit. That means Obama has presided over three consecutive $1-trillion-plus deficits.
(I know. I know. It’s all George W. Bush’s fault.)
This is not cool, people.
This is why we’re in the economic pickle we’re in. Nobody wants to spend money. Regardless of whether you’re a consumer or a business owner, you just don’t want to spend money. You don’t want to expand or capitalize or hire people. Things are too uncertain, too unsettled.
A big part of this out-of-control spending has to do with Obama’s stimulus plan.
Boskin also talked about that.
The administration claims the $850 billion stimulus created 3 million jobs. If that’s true – for the sake of argument, we’ll say it is –  Boskin notes the cost per job is $280,000. The private sector creates jobs at a rate of about $60K.
Comes now Obama asking for another $400 or $500 billion in stimulus and higher taxes on rich people.
Am I the only one who sees this as insane?



Archives